🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.